What are the most common positions on the ethical status of consuming human flesh?
What are the most common positions on the ethical status of consuming human flesh? What are the philosophical arguments condemning it, and what are those that condone it?
There is the distinction between lethal cannibalism, which involves killing and nonlethal cannibalism, which does not involve killing. How might nonlethal cannibalism occur?
One kind of case involves people who are stuck in places without food and are forced to consume the flesh of other people, with or without permission. It might be suggested that unless the lives of other people are at stake, respect for dead people requires that their bodies not be ingested by others.
It might be unwise to permit nonlethal cannibalism because such a policy might encourage lethal cannibalism. But nonlethal cannibalism was the norm in many old societies.
Anthropological descriptions of allegedly irresolvable cross-cultural ethical conflicts are plentiful: One must be careful not to infer that nonlethal cannibalism is morally wrong merely because one finds it disgusting or repulsive. Everyone is familiar with disgusting taste, in many cases we see or think about some particular ethical issue and we have exactly the same disgust response.
Typical examples are when people think about cannibalism, about abortion, incest. Is there some biological explanation of why we should have such feelings? Many of us are familiar with having disgust reactions. So, many of the taboos can have a strong biological basis.
Our disgust reaction can represent the expression of that knowledge. It can also be learnt at a social level and it can be passed on through generations.
But many the taboos either express a personal disgust or misfire in the sense that they are applied to a situation that is no longer disadvantageous to us. The reaction to eggs can persisted long after.
Another example, with incest, we now have very good genetic tests that would pick up genetic abnormality. So, we can now in modern society counter that. The challenge of modern ethics today is not simply to sit with our intuitions, because our intuitions are not necessarily reliable.
We need to examine our reasons for actions are in a particular case. They are very crude rules of thumb that have served us in our primitive past.
Actually our reason-giving frequently is a kind of rationalization after the fact; most people end up rationalizing their deepest prejudices and disgusting reactions.
Many people do use ethical arguments simply to rationalize their intuitive responses. A psychologist, Jonathan Haidt, used a scenario around incest and cannibalism where he kept probing participants in the experiment for their reason for their objections.
The key question was whether subjects would behave like idealized scientists, looking for the truth and using reasoning to reach their judgments, or whether they would behave like lawyers, committed from the start to one side and then searching only for evidence to support that side.
When these reasons were stripped away by the experimenter,few subjects changed their minds, even though many confessed that they could not explain the reasons for their decisions. However, the subjects stuck to their intuitive objection to it, regardless of how invalid their supposed reason was.
We must resolve moral issues through rational discourse, rather than descending to a kind of democratic approach to ethics where we take a vote as to how people respond, how much disgusting there is out there in a population towards that particular practice.
Many people have a disgusting response to changing human nature.Jun 07, · Several brutal crimes allegedly involving face biting, dismemberment and cannibalism have recently offered a chilling reminder that real life can be as bizarre as fiction -- even a horror film.
Trying to explain the psychology behind cannibalism can be even scarier. The motivational driving force underlying sexual cannibalism in some ways appears to resemble that of sadomasochism from a dominance and submission perspective. Psychology Today reports that in many cases, cutting up the human flesh is often sexually arousing.
Removing the meat, peeling it and then having their way with it is enough to induce orgasms, according to cannibals, because the euphoria of being in control makes them feel so powerful.
“Fear is a cheap emotion, but I’m not going to tell you there’s nothing to be frightened of. If Alfred Packer’s cannibalism victims woke up the morning of their deaths humming “Don’t Worry, Be Happy,” they were mistaken.”.
The issues of cannibalism and the psychology behind it Posted by on Nov 8, in Copywriting | 0 comments Home» Copywriting» The issues of cannibalism and the psychology behind it.
May 19, · Cannibalism is among the highest taboos humans can ever commit. But what is it and why does it exist? This episode on WEtheorists, let's explore the history and psychology behind cannibalism!