These are basically unresolvable with anything less than a lifetime of philosophical work, but they usually allow mutual understanding and respect. More detail on what I mean by each level: Meta-debate is discussion of the debate itself rather than the ideas being debated. Is one side being hypocritical?
Why was Hitler a saint? What do you think, man, is that a fair question? In fact I think every single White should always stay out of the business of non-Whites.
Let them live or die as nature and luck would have it. The world to me is White vs. Well, anyway, in the very first sentence of the book—in the first four words—the author sets the premise and his conclusion by asking: What a stupid way to start such a book. It might have been acceptable to start with something like: Such a biased value judgment in a book that is supposed to be making a non-emotional and rational investigation of something is absurd and is hardly an unemotional and intellectual look at the subject.
Was it morally bad for Saint Hitler to want to save White people? Was it morally bad for Saint Hitler to want to consciously help evolution go in the best direction so White people become smarter, healthier and less prone to diseases and afflictions and live longer, happier, more fulfilled lives?
What about the war and all that?
That was thrust upon him. He was simply trying to protect Germans who were living in lands that were once part of Germany or adjacent to it and which had large ethnic German populations. And, of course, there were the Communists who wanted war as part of their plan for world domination.
When all the anti-White propaganda dies, and it will, Whites really may come to think of Hitler as a saint and a savior who was fighting the forces of evil and darkness that were, and which still are, trying to destroy us as a distinct and unique people.
Yes, these forces are playing at White genocide. These dark forces won a temporary victory against good in the skirmish that was WWII.
And, it really was just a skirmish in the long view of history. Although haters try to paint Saint Hitler as just being for Germans, he was really for all Whites. He was Pan-Whitest or Pan-Aryanist they mean the same thing.
Today, even some of the lowest consciousness Whites can see the war on White people that is raging in every formerly all White but now mixed nations. So, is it evil to help White people survive?
And, is it evil to want us to improve? Is it evil that Saint Hitler was concerned about White people and not other peoples? That way lies our genocide and extinction. Such a belief is anti-nature, anti-evolution and anti-White.
We must diverge more from other types of humans. That is our highest possible destiny, but it requires that we avoid any gene flow from other types of humans in order for the fundamental forces of evolution to work.
Even though evolution never stops and it works whether we know it or not, we are thinking beings, and we now know how much of evolution works. With such knowledge, we are commanded to take charge of our evolution or risk devolution.
Having this knowledge puts the responsibility squarely on our shoulders. It is a heavy responsibility but it is our responsibility as White people. We must will ourselves forward along an evolutionary trajectory that is best for us alone.
We have no responsibility to other kinds of humans.Oct 16, · The idea of overwhelming an enemy with quantity rather than quality may seem at odds with a U.S.
military that has usually emphasized having . Intro duction. Thomas Kuhn coined the modern definition of the word “paradigm” in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, published in A paradigm, according to Kuhn's definition, is a conceptual model that explains a set of scientific observations, which creates a framework to fit the observations.
Rae West 20th August Some people believe that whites need to reunite as Christian communities as part of the process of opposing so-called 'Jews'. Or to return to what they think was a comfortable, better life as Christians.
Title: Was the holocaust planned or circumstantial, A-Level history Description: ‘Using the four passages and your own knowledge assess the view that the Holocaust was mainly the result of a long term plan by Hitler to eliminate the Jews.’ This work is an investigative essay into whether the holocaust was planned, paraphrases to the authors of the .
The Holocaust Was Mainly a Result of a Long Term Plan by Hitler to Eliminate the Jews Crucially, very few historians would now argue that the Holocaust itself; the carefully coordinated genocide of Europe’s Jewish population, was a long term plan by Hitler.
The Business of War. By Wade Frazier. Revised July Introduction. The Business of War. The "Good War" Brown Shirts in America.
A Brief History of Western Anti .